In California, the state’s Lemon Law protects car buyers who find themselves driving defective vehicles. Various myths surround this legislation that are the root of widespread misconceptions.
Debunking these fallacies is the first step toward enlightenment.
Myth 1. The law covers all defects
One mistaken belief is that the Lemon Law applies to all mechanical problems. Those familiar with the policy know it pertains only to issues that substantially impair a car’s use, value or safety and persist despite reasonable repair attempts. Minor concerns may not meet the law’s criteria.
Myth 2. Only new cars enjoy protection
Another misunderstanding suggests that the Lemon Law only covers brand-new cars. In truth, the rule protects new and used automobiles as long as they are still under the manufacturer’s warranty and within the first 18 months or 18,000 miles of use, whichever comes first.
Myth 3. Multiple repair tries are necessary
Some believe that more than one trip to the mechanic must happen for a vehicle to qualify. If the manufacturer or authorized dealer cannot correct it within an acceptable timeframe, the vehicle may be a lemon and thus eligible.
Myth 4. Consumers must pay for legal services
Another prevalent misconception is that owners must bear the cost of going to court. Mercifully, the law often mandates that the manufacturer pay attorney’s fees should the consumer prevail in a lemon law case.
Myth 5. It only applies to cars
Contrary to popular belief, the Lemon Law serves a variety of motor vehicles, including motorcycles, motorhomes and certain types of trailers. This broader coverage ensures that many Golden State residents suffering mechanical problems can seek redress.
Understanding the realities of the Lemon Law is fundamental for drivers dealing with automotive troubles. Dispelling these myths means that people have accurate information and are confident when asserting their rights.